|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Literary Theory''' is the systematic study of the nature of literature, the evaluation of literary works, and the methodologies employed in the analysis of texts. It encompasses various approaches and perspectives that have evolved over centuries, shaping how both scholars and readers perceive and interpret literature. As a field of inquiry, literary theory grapples with questions about the creation, context, and reception of texts, offering insights into the interplay between authorial intent, reader response, and the socio-cultural environment in which a work is produced. | | '''Literary Theory''' is the systematic study of the nature of literature, the methods of interpreting it, and the concepts surrounding the meaning and experience of literature. This field encompasses a range of approaches, including formalism, structuralism, post-structuralism, psychoanalysis, feminism, postcolonialism, and many others. Each of these approaches provides different insights into texts and their effects on readers and culture, reflecting the complexities of literature as an art form. |
|
| |
|
| == Historical Background or Origin == | | == Historical Background == |
| | The origins of literary theory can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, with philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle laying down the foundational questions about artistic representation, mimesis, and the role of the author. Plato, in works such as "The Republic," questioned the value of poetry in society, arguing that it was a mere imitation of reality and thus inferior to philosophy. In contrast, Aristotle's "Poetics" provided a systematic examination of tragedy, arguing for the cathartic effect of dramatic representation. |
|
| |
|
| Literary theory has roots that can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where philosophical inquiries into art and literature began to surface. Notably, ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle laid foundational ideas concerning mimesis (imitation) and the function of art in society. Plato, in his dialogues, criticized poetry for its potential to mislead and evoke irrational emotions, leading to his dismissal of poets from his ideal republic. Conversely, Aristotle’s "Poetics" provided a systematic approach to literary criticism, establishing criteria for tragedy and epic poetry that influenced subsequent literary analysis.
| | During the Renaissance, literary criticism evolved, influenced by classical texts. This period saw a resurgence of interest in the interplay between author, text, and reader, culminating in the rise of the individual artist as a central figure in literary creation. The advent of the Enlightenment introduced new ideas about reason, progress, and the role of art in society. Critics like Alexander Pope and Samuel Johnson began to articulate the principles of taste and judgment in literature. |
|
| |
|
| During the Middle Ages, literary theory became intertwined with theology. The works of Saint Augustine and Dante Alighieri emphasized the moral and spiritual dimensions of literature. The Renaissance brought about a renewed interest in classical texts and a shift toward humanism, paving the way for scholars such as Sir Philip Sidney and Ben Jonson to discuss the role of the poet and the purpose of poetry.
| | The 19th century brought about a variety of movements, such as Romanticism, which emphasized emotion, nature, and the sublime, while the rise of realism focused on everyday life and social issues. Literature began to be seen not just as an aesthetic pursuit, but as a reflection of society and culture. This shift paved the way for early 20th-century movements like formalism and New Criticism, which prioritized close readings of texts over authorial intent or historical context. |
|
| |
|
| The Enlightenment period saw the emergence of the empiricist and rationalist discourses that influenced literary theory. Critics like Alexander Pope and Samuel Johnson approached literature with an emphasis on reason and nature. The Romantics further revolutionized literary thought by prioritizing emotion, individual experience, and the sublime, leading to a divergence from the ideals of previous eras.
| | == Theoretical Foundations == |
| | Literary theory is underpinned by several theoretical foundations that have emerged over the years. These foundations help to situate literary works within broader philosophical, sociopolitical, and cultural contexts. |
|
| |
|
| By the 19th century, formal literary criticism began to take shape through the works of figures like Matthew Arnold and the early critics of realism and naturalism. As literature became increasingly associated with specific socio-political contexts, movements such as Marxism and psychoanalysis began to intersect with literary studies, establishing a dialogue between literature and the broader ideological currents of society.
| | === Structuralism === |
| | Structuralism emerged in the early 20th century as a reaction against previous modes of literary analysis. It posits that literature can be understood through a system of structures, such as language, symbols, and underlying patterns. Structuralists focus on the relationships between elements within texts, rather than the texts themselves or their authors. Prominent figures within this movement include Ferdinand de Saussure, whose theories on semiotics greatly influenced literary theory. Saussure argued that meaning is derived from the differences and relationships between signs rather than from the signs themselves. |
|
| |
|
| == Theoretical Foundations == | | === Post-structuralism === |
| | Post-structuralism developed as a critique of structuralism, emphasizing that meanings are not fixed and can shift based on context and interpretation. Thinkers such as Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault challenged the idea of a definitive text, asserting that interpretation is shaped by the reader's perspective and societal context. Derrida's concept of "deconstruction" involves analyzing texts to reveal inherent contradictions and ambiguities, thereby destabilizing traditional readings and authoritative interpretations. |
|
| |
|
| Understanding literary theory requires an examination of its various theoretical foundations, which can be grouped into several major schools of thought. Each approach offers distinct methodologies and conceptual frameworks for interpreting texts.
| | === Psychoanalytic Criticism === |
| | Psychoanalytic criticism applies theories from psychology, especially those articulated by Sigmund Freud, to the analysis of literature. This approach often focuses on the unconscious motivations of characters, authors, and texts. Freud's concept of repression and the Oedipal complex provides tools for understanding character relationships and authorial intentions. Later theorists, such as Jacques Lacan, extended these ideas, incorporating aspects of modern psychology to explore the interplay between subjectivity and the symbolic order in literature. |
|
| |
|
| === Formalism and New Criticism === | | === Marxist Criticism === |
| | Marxist literary criticism stems from the theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, emphasizing the relationship between literature and class struggle. This approach asserts that literary works reflect, perpetuate, or challenge the dominant ideologies of their time. Critics analyze texts in relation to the economic and social conditions of their production and reception, arguing that understanding literature necessitates an awareness of the societal forces at play. The works of Georg Lukács and Terry Eagleton exemplify this theoretical framework. |
|
| |
|
| Formalism emerged in the early 20th century, focusing on the intrinsic qualities of a literary work, including its form, structure, and aesthetic devices. Russian Formalists such as Viktor Shklovsky and Roman Jakobson emphasized the "literariness" of texts and the role of language in shaping literary meaning. They argued that the study of literature should prioritize the textual features and relationships over external factors like authorial intent or historical context.
| | == Key Concepts and Methodologies == |
| | Literary theory encompasses a range of key concepts that shape its methodologies. Understanding these concepts is crucial for both practitioners and students of literary studies. |
|
| |
|
| New Criticism, which gained prominence in the United States in the mid-20th century, reiterated these formalist principles by advocating for close readings of texts. Prominent critics like John Crowe Ransom and Cleanth Brooks argued that literary works should be analyzed independently of their authors and cultural backgrounds. This approach sought to uncover the complex layers of meaning within the text itself, emphasizing concepts such as paradox, ambiguity, and tension.
| | === Intertextuality === |
| | Intertextuality refers to the interconnectedness of texts and the ways in which they influence one another. This concept, popularized by Julia Kristeva, suggests that no text exists in isolation; rather, texts are in constant dialogue with past works. Analyzing intertextual relationships allows critics to uncover how authors engage with their literary predecessors and contemporaries, creating a tapestry of meaning informed by shared cultural and literary contexts. |
|
| |
|
| === Structuralism and Post-Structuralism === | | === Reader-Response Criticism === |
| | Reader-response criticism shifts the focus from the text or author to the reader's experience and interpretation. This approach argues that meaning is co-created by the reader and text, suggesting that individual interpretations can vary widely based on personal background, culture, and emotional engagement. Prominent theorists in this field include Wolfgang Iser and Stanley Fish, who emphasize the active role of the reader in constructing meaning. |
|
| |
|
| Structuralism emerged in the mid-20th century, influenced by linguistic theories, particularly those of Ferdinand de Saussure. This school of thought, associated with theorists like Claude Lévi-Strauss and Roland Barthes, emphasized the underlying structures that govern language, culture, and literature. Structuralists argued that texts operate within systems of signs and significations, revealing the patterns and conventions that shape meaning. The role of the reader was downplayed, as the focus shifted toward the structures that inform text production.
| | === Feminist Literary Criticism === |
| | Feminist literary criticism analyzes the representation of gender in literature and critiques the ways in which patriarchal values are embedded in texts. This approach seeks to uncover the roles and perspectives of women, addressing issues of agency, identity, and power. Feminist critics such as Elaine Showalter and Hélène Cixous have challenged traditional interpretations, providing new insights into female characters and authors while highlighting the limited roles historically assigned to women in literature. |
|
| |
|
| In response to structuralism, post-structuralism questioned the fixed meanings proposed by structuralist theory. Thinkers such as Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault argued that meaning is inherently unstable and subject to endless interpretation. Deconstruction, a key method associated with Derrida, aims to uncover the contradictions and ambiguities within texts, challenging the notion of a singular author's intent or a definitive interpretation. This approach positioned the reader as an active participant in constructing meaning, leading to a proliferation of potential interpretations.
| | === Postcolonial Theory === |
| | Postcolonial theory examines the cultural, political, and economic legacies of colonialism and imperialism through literature. This field seeks to understand how colonized societies grapple with their identities through the lens of colonial history, and to analyze how literature can both reinforce and resist colonial narratives. Edward Said’s concept of "Orientalism" critiques Western representations of the East, while theorists like Homi Bhabha and Gayatri Spivak explore hybrid identities and the voice of the subaltern. |
|
| |
|
| === Marxism and Cultural Theory === | | == Real-world Applications or Case Studies == |
| | Literary theory is not confined to academia; rather, it has wide-ranging applications in various fields, including education, cultural studies, and social justice. |
|
| |
|
| Marxism and cultural theory explore the relationship between literature, culture, and society. Influenced by Karl Marx’s observations on class struggle and ideology, literary critics like Georg Lukács and Theodor Adorno analyzed literature's role in reflecting and shaping social conditions. Marxist literary criticism focuses on the representation of class dynamics, power structures, and economic systems within texts, promoting the idea that literature can serve as a social critique.
| | === Educational Practices === |
| | Literary theory informs pedagogical practices in the teaching of literature. Educators often employ different theoretical frameworks to help students engage with texts critically. For instance, utilizing feminist criticism can lead to discussions surrounding gender representation and societal norms, while a postcolonial approach may prompt explorations of identity and power dynamics from multiple perspectives. By integrating literary theory into classroom practices, educators can foster a deeper understanding of texts and their relevance to contemporary issues. |
|
| |
|
| Cultural studies, which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, expanded the scope of literary analysis to include broader cultural phenomena, exploring the interplay between literature and various aspects of culture like race, gender, and sexuality. Figures like Stuart Hall and Raymond Williams examined how literary texts both reflect and resist cultural ideologies, emphasizing the importance of context in understanding literary meaning. | | === Cultural Analysis === |
| | In the realm of cultural studies, literary theory provides tools for analyzing cultural artifacts beyond traditional literature. Films, advertisements, and popular music can be examined through a variety of theoretical lenses, allowing critics to explore societal narratives and ideologies encoded within these forms. For example, applying psychoanalytic theory to film can reveal underlying themes of desire and repression, while structuralism may provide insights into the narrative structures of modern media. |
|
| |
|
| == Key Concepts and Methodologies == | | === Case Study: "The Great Gatsby" === |
| | F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby" serves as a rich text for exploring multiple literary theories. Through a Marxist lens, one can examine the class divides and capitalist critique inherent in the novel. A feminist reading may highlight the roles of female characters like Daisy Buchanan, scrutinizing the limitations placed upon women in the 1920s. Reader-response criticism allows for an exploration of how contemporary readers' experiences shape their interpretations of the American Dream depicted in the text. |
|
| |
|
| Literary theory encompasses a range of key concepts and methodologies that guide the analytical process. Each theoretical approach introduces specific terminologies and analytical tools that scholars utilize to interrogate texts.
| | == Contemporary Developments or Debates == |
| | In the 21st century, literary theory continues to evolve, incorporating new perspectives and responding to global developments. Recent debates within the field reflect broader societal issues and technological advancements. |
|
| |
|
| === Intertextuality === | | === Digital Humanities === |
| | The rise of digital technologies has introduced new methodologies for literary analysis, leading to the emergence of digital humanities. Scholars employ computational tools to analyze large corpora of texts, revealing patterns and trends that were previously difficult to discern. This shift raises questions about traditional interpretive methods and the role of technology in shaping literary studies. Issues of access, representation, and the ethics of digital scholarship are at the forefront of contemporary debates. |
|
| |
|
| Intertextuality is a fundamental concept in literary theory that acknowledges the interconnectedness of texts. Coined by literary theorist Julia Kristeva, the term highlights that no literary work exists in isolation; instead, it is shaped by and converses with other texts. This idea invites readers to consider how elements such as allusion, quotation, and genre influence the meaning of a work. Intertextual analysis entails examining the relationships among texts and the cultural, historical, and social contexts that inform those relationships.
| | === Intersectionality === |
| | The concept of intersectionality, which addresses how various social categorizations such as race, class, and gender interconnect, has gained prominence within literary criticism. This framework provides a nuanced approach to understanding characterizations and narratives, recognizing the multifaceted experiences of individuals. Critics are increasingly interrogating how texts reflect and shape intersecting identities, leading to richer analyses that encompass diverse perspectives. |
|
| |
|
| === Reader-Response Theory === | | === Globalization and World Literature === |
| | The increasing interconnectedness of cultures has led to the rise of globalization studies within literary theory. Scholars explore how literature transcends national boundaries, examining how global issues such as migration, climate change, and inequality are represented in contemporary texts. This perspective also prompts discussions about the notions of the canon and the inclusivity of voices in world literature, with critics advocating for broader definitions that embrace marginalized narratives. |
|
| |
|
| Reader-response theory shifts the focus from the author or the text to the reader's role in creating meaning. Influenced by theorists like Stanley Fish and Wolfgang Iser, this approach posits that each reader brings their own experiences, beliefs, and emotions to the act of reading, thereby allowing for multiple interpretations of a single text. The reader's interaction with the text becomes a dynamic process, where the meaning is co-constructed through individual interpretation. This theory recognizes that the act of reading is influenced by various contexts, including cultural, social, and psychological factors.
| | == Criticism and Limitations == |
| | While literary theory provides valuable frameworks for analyzing texts, it is not without its pitfalls and criticisms. Critics argue that certain theories may oversimplify or distort the complexities of literature, leading to reductive readings that fail to recognize the richness of textual interpretation. |
|
| |
|
| === Feminist Literary Criticism === | | === Overemphasis on Theory === |
| | Some scholars contend that the emphasis on theoretical frameworks can detract from the enjoyment and appreciation of literature. This critique suggests that an overreliance on theory can inhibit the organic experience of reading, as readers may become overly focused on dissecting texts rather than absorbing their narrative qualities and emotional impacts. |
|
| |
|
| Feminist literary criticism examines literature through the lens of gender, exploring the representation of women and the impact of patriarchal structures on literary production. Early feminist critics such as Virginia Woolf and Simone de Beauvoir challenged the depictions of women in literature, drawing attention to the marginalization of female voices and experiences. Contemporary feminist theories have expanded to include intersections with race, sexuality, and class, leading to diverse approaches that interrogate how literature reinforces or challenges gender norms. This analytical lens enables the exploration of how authors construct female identities and the societal implications of these representations.
| | === Exclusivity of Perspectives === |
| | Certain critiques highlight the exclusivity that can arise from dominant theoretical frameworks, suggesting that specific methodologies may marginalize alternative voices and perspectives. For instance, traditional canon formation often privileges Eurocentric narratives while overlooking the contributions of diverse authors. This raises important questions about inclusivity and representation within literary studies and the need for more comprehensive approaches that honor a broader array of voices. |
|
| |
|
| === Psychoanalytic Criticism === | | === The Challenge of Pluralism === |
| | As literary theory continues to diversify, critics face the challenge of pluralism within the discipline. The coexistence of multiple theoretical approaches can lead to a fragmented discourse where competing narratives struggle for prominence. This raises questions about the potential for synthesis among differing perspectives and the implications of such plurality for the future of literary analysis. |
|
| |
|
| Psychoanalytic criticism draws on the theories of Sigmund Freud and later psychoanalysts to analyze literary texts. This approach investigates the psychological dimensions of characters, authors, and readers, considering the unconscious motivations and desires that underlie narrative structures. Critics such as André Breton and Julia Kristeva have utilized psychoanalytic frameworks to explore themes of repression, identity formation, and the importance of dreams and fantasies within literature. Psychoanalytic criticism involves looking for symbolic meanings and psychological depth within characters and plots, thereby revealing complex human experiences.
| | == See also == |
| | * [[Literary Criticism]] |
| | * [[Postcolonial Literature]] |
| | * [[Feminist Literary Criticism]] |
| | * [[Psychoanalysis]] |
| | * [[Structuralism and Poststructuralism]] |
|
| |
|
| == Real-world Applications or Case Studies ==
| | == References == |
| | | * Eagleton, Terry. ''Literary Theory: An Introduction''. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983. |
| Literary theory finds substantial application in the analysis of specific texts, movements, and genres. By employing various theoretical frameworks, scholars can illuminate deeper meanings and cultural implications within literature.
| | * Barthes, Roland. ”The Death of the Author.” ''Image, Music, Text''. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. |
| | | * Said, Edward. ''Orientalism''. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978. |
| === The Gothic Novel ===
| | * Kristeva, Julia. “The Bounded Text.” ''Revolution in Poetic Language''. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984. |
| | | * Foucault, Michel. ''The Archaeology of Knowledge''. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972. |
| The Gothic novel is a genre that can be extensively analyzed through various theoretical lenses. Feminist criticism, for instance, has been applied to works such as Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" and Bram Stoker's "Dracula." These texts examine themes of power dynamics, sexuality, and gender roles, particularly as they relate to societal expectations during the Victorian era. Feminist critics highlight how the Gothic may serve as a critique of patriarchy by positioning women as both victims and agents, subverting traditional narratives surrounding gender.
| |
| | |
| Psychoanalytic criticism can also be employed to analyze the psychological undercurrents within Gothic literature. Texts like Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" or Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s "The Yellow Wallpaper" reveal insights into madness, repression, and the conflict between desire and societal norms. Psychoanalysts might explore the symbolic meanings of the house, the heart, or the experience of confinement in these narratives, offering an understanding of the characters' internal struggles.
| |
| | |
| === Postcolonial Literature ===
| |
| | |
| Postcolonial literary theory provides rich avenues for exploring texts produced in the aftermath of colonialism. Scholars have examined the works of writers such as Chinua Achebe, Salman Rushdie, and Derek Walcott, revealing how these authors address issues of identity, power, and cultural hybridity. Theoretical frameworks developed by postcolonial theorists such as Edward Said and Homi Bhabha emphasize the ways in which colonial narratives shaped representations of the colonized and challenge dominant cultural ideologies.
| |
| | |
| For instance, Achebe's novel "Things Fall Apart" serves as a critique of colonialism, illustrating the devastating impacts it has on indigenous cultures. Through the lens of postcolonial criticism, readers can discern how Achebe reclaims narratives, offering alternative perspectives that resist colonial tropes and stereotypes. The analysis of postcolonial literature shines a light on the ongoing struggles for identity and agency within a global context.
| |
| | |
| === Digital Literature and New Media ===
| |
| | |
| The rise of digital literature and new media presents a new frontier for literary theory. Scholars are increasingly exploring how hypertextual narratives, blogs, and interactive storytelling challenge traditional literary forms. This domain has spurred discussions around interactivity, non-linearity, and the fluidity of authorship in the digital age.
| |
| | |
| The evolution of readership in response to digital media necessitates re-evaluation of reader-response theory. Digital texts often engage readers in ways that traditional printed literature does not, encouraging active participation in narrative construction. The relationship between technology and literature invites critiques regarding accessibility, the commercialization of literature, and global disparities in digital literacy.
| |
| | |
| == Contemporary Developments or Debates ==
| |
| | |
| The landscape of literary theory is continuously evolving, as contemporary theorists grapple with the implications of new social, technological, and cultural changes. These developments reflect ongoing debates within the field, as scholars re-evaluate established methodologies and explore emerging areas of inquiry.
| |
| | |
| === Ecocriticism ===
| |
| | |
| Ecocriticism has emerged as a significant contemporary movement within literary theory, focusing on the intersection of literature and environmental concerns. Scholars within this field analyze the representation of nature, ecological relationships, and environmental crises in literature. This critical approach recognizes that literature can contribute to environmental discourse by shaping public perceptions and values related to nature and sustainability.
| |
| | |
| By engaging with texts through the lens of ecocriticism, critics examine how environmental themes play a role in shaping narratives and character development. Works such as Rachel Carson’s "Silent Spring" or Margaret Atwood’s "Oryx and Crake" demonstrate how literature can not only reflect but also challenge cultural attitudes towards the environment.
| |
| | |
| === Globalization and Cosmopolitanism ===
| |
| | |
| Globalization and cosmopolitanism have prompted significant discussions in contemporary literary theory, particularly regarding the circulation of texts and the ways literature transcends national boundaries. The interconnectedness resulting from globalization has led to a proliferation of voices and perspectives within literary studies. Theoretical inquiries in this area investigate questions of cultural identity, nationhood, and the role of literature in articulating the complexities of global interrelationships.
| |
| | |
| Scholars are increasingly attentive to issues such as diaspora literature, transnational narratives, and cultural hybridization. These inquiries challenge the traditional notions of a singular national literature, emphasizing instead the importance of understanding literary production within a globalized context.
| |
| | |
| === The Role of Technology in Literature ===
| |
| | |
| The advent of technology has not only changed the ways literature is produced and consumed but has also prompted significant theoretical discussions regarding its impact on literary values and cultural practices. Scholars are examining the implications of social media, e-books, and online publishing on authorship, reader engagement, and the concept of literary merit.
| |
| | |
| As literature increasingly finds expression through digital platforms, theorists are questioning the effects of algorithmic culture on narrative structures and thematic expressions. The engagement with technological mediums fosters debates about originality, authenticity, and the evolving relationship between literature and its audiences in the contemporary age.
| |
| | |
| == Criticism and Limitations ==
| |
| | |
| While literary theory has made substantial contributions to our understanding of texts, it is not without criticism and limitations. Critics argue that some theoretical frameworks can be overly prescriptive or dismissive of the complexities inherent in individual texts and their readers.
| |
| | |
| === Overemphasis on Theory ===
| |
| | |
| One critique of literary theory is that it can become overly theoretical, prioritizing abstract concepts at the expense of the textual analysis. Some scholars argue that adhering too rigidly to specific theoretical lenses risks limiting the richness of literary interpretation, leading to reductive readings that overlook nuanced meanings. This overemphasis on theory can also detract from the enjoyment of literature, as readers may feel pressured to engage with texts solely through a theoretical framework.
| |
| | |
| === Neglect of Reader Experience ===
| |
| | |
| Additionally, certain theoretical approaches, particularly formalism and structuralism, have been criticized for minimizing the role of the reader and their personal experiences in interpreting a text. This perspective can result in the neglect of the emotional and psychological dimensions of reading, which are integral to many readers' relationships with literature. Reader-response theory seeks to counter this by emphasizing the reader's active role; however, the challenge remains in balancing rigorous analysis with recognition of the subjective experience of reading.
| |
| | |
| === Cultural and Historical Context ===
| |
| | |
| Another limitation involves the potential neglect of broader cultural and historical contexts in favor of abstract theoretical paradigms. Although many literary theories recognize the importance of context, critics contend that an exclusive focus on theoretical constructs can lead to a disconnect from the social and political realities that inform literary production. This concern highlights the need for a multi-dimensional approach that integrates both theoretical frameworks and contextual analysis.
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| * [[Feminist Literary Criticism]]
| |
| * [[Structuralism]]
| |
| * [[Postcolonialism]]
| |
| * [[Ecocriticism]]
| |
| * [[Reader-Response Theory]]
| |
| * [[Psychoanalytic Criticism]]
| |
| | |
| == References == | |
| * Eagleton, Terry. ''Literary Theory: An Introduction''. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983. | |
| * Culler, Jonathan. ''Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. | |
| * Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. ''Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics''. London: Routledge, 2002. | |
| * McHale, Brian. ''Postmodernist Fiction''. New York: Routledge, 1987. | |
| * Bhabha, Homi K. ''The Location of Culture''. London: Routledge, 1994. | |
| * Barthes, Roland. ''Image, Music, Text''. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:Literary theory]] | | [[Category:Literary theory]] |
| [[Category:Literary criticism]]
| |
| [[Category:Humanities]] | | [[Category:Humanities]] |
| | [[Category:Social sciences]] |